Dekontruksi Narasi Toleransi, Intoleransi, dan Radikalisme dalam Buku Ajar PPKN Kelas XII Kurikulum Merdeka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35897/jurnaltinta.v8i1.2603Keywords:
deconstruction, tolerance, intolerance, radicalism, civic education, critical discourse analysisAbstract
This study aims to deconstruct the narration of tolerance, intolerance, and radicalism in handbook PkN for grade XII Kurikulum Merdeka. This study employs critical discourse analysis deconstruction theoretical framework. The findings reveal three main theses. First, the textbook constructs "tolerance" as procedural compliance with the state's definition, rather than as substantive dialogue open to ambiguity and irreconcilable differences. Second, the narratives of intolerance and radicalism are built upon hierarchical binary oppositions (Pancasila versus other ideologies; tolerant versus intolerant; nationalism versus radicalism) that oversimplify historical and political complexities while simultaneously suppressing the trace of controversial cases implicating the state as an agent of intolerance. Third, the textbook contains significant internal contradictions, including "repressive tolerance" (the state enforces tolerance through threats of symbolic and legal violence) as well as a gap between the acknowledgment of structural discrimination and the absence of critique regarding the state's role in reproducing exclusion. This research contributes to the enrichment of critical curriculum studies in the Indonesian context, specifically in illuminating how the state, through curriculum and textbooks, shapes official discourse on the boundaries of tolerance while simultaneously foreclosing the possibility of honest public deliberation about democracy's internal contradictions. Its pedagogical implications underscore the need to develop critical reading skills for both teachers and students, along with policy recommendations for textbooks to open spaces for discussing the ethical dilemmas of tolerance rather than merely presenting ready-made values.
Downloads
References
Amir, I., Nursalam, Wardihan, Rahim, A., & Nurhikmah. (2026). Buku Teks Sebagai Instrumen Diskursif: Analisis Wacana Kritis Terhadap Wacana Moderasi Beragama dalam Buku Bahasa Indonesia SMA Kelas X. ALFABETA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 9(1), 25–38.
Amrullah, Z., & Rida, M. F. (2021). Pembacaan buku teks Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti kelas X SMA dalam perspektif toleransi dan intoleransi beragama. AJMIE: Al-Hikam Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Education, 2(2), 21–33.
Cisney, V. W. (2019). Implications and Conslusions. In Deleuze and Derrida: Difference and the Power of the Negative (pp. 249–282). Edinburgh University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/deleuze-and-derrida/conclusions/657698AE34CAB7EDDEB21B251B63CBBF
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. John Hopkins University Press.
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1981). Position. University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1982). Jacques Derrida Différance. In Margins of Philospohy (pp. 3–27). University of Chicago Press. https://web.stanford.edu/class/history34q/readings/Derrida/Differance.html
Derrida, J. (1983). Letter to a Japanese Friend. https://grattoncourses.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/letter_to_a_japanese.pdf
Fusnika, Hartini, A., & Cali, H. M. (2023). ANALISIS NILAI TOLERANSI PADA MATA PELAJARAN PPKN SEBAGAI UPAYA MENCEGAH TINDAKAN INTOLERANSI DI KELAS IX C SMPN 1 SEMITAU TAHUN PELAJARAN 2022/2023. Jurnal PEKAN, 8(2), 105–111.
Gunkel, D. J. (2020). What the National Review Gets Wrong About Deconstruction. The MIT Press Reader. https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/what-the-national-review-gets-wrong-about-deconstruction/
Harsaid, Y., Anwar, M., & Rohman, S. (2024). Pedagogi Kritis dalam Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Fase F: Kajian Analisis Wacana Kritis. Perpustakaan Sekolah Pascasarjana UNJ.
INFID. (2025). Fakta Mengejutkan: 42,5% Orang Muda Intoleran, INFID Tegaskan Peran Mereka sebagai Agen Perubahan dalam HAM. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/fakta-mengejutkan-425-orang-muda-intoleran-infid-tegaskan-peran-mereka-sebagai-agen-perubahan-dalam-ham-474178-mvk.html#google_vignette
Kemenag. (2019a). LHS dan Moderasi Beragama. Kemenag.Go.Id.
Kemenag. (2024a). Kerukunan Beragama di Indonesia Meningkat, Indeks KUB 2024 Capai 76,47, Kategori Sangat Tinggi. https://bimashindu.kemenag.go.id/berita-pusat/kerukunan-beragama-di-indonesia-meningkat-indeks-kub-2024-capai-76-47-kategori-sangat-tinggi-4VP9h
Kemenag. (2024b). Mahmud: Keberhasilan Moderasi Beragama Diukur melalui 4 Indikator Utama. Gorontalo.Kemenag.Go.Id.
Kemenag. (2025). Hasil Survei Kemenag 2025: Tingkat Toleransi dan Kesalehan Umat di Indonesia Masuk Kategori Sangat Tinggi. https://www.ayosemarang.com/umum/7716458876/hasil-survei-kemenag-2025-tingkat-toleransi-dan-kesalehan-umat-di-indonesia-masuk-kategori-sangat-tinggi?page=2
Kemenag, L. (2019b). Moderasi Beragama.
Kompas. (2022). Survei Litbang “Kompas”: Sikap Toleransi Masyarakat Tinggi, tetapi Dibayangi Ancaman Konflik Agama dan Politik. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/11/14/11365351/survei-litbang-kompas-sikap-toleransi-masyarakat-tinggi-tetapi-dibayangi?page=all#google_vignette
Mendie, J. G., & Udofia, S. N. (2020). A Philosophical Analysis of Jacques Derrida’s Contributions to Language and Meaning. PINISI: Discretion Review, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v4i1.14528
Muhammadiyah. (2022). Apa saja indikator moderasi beragama menurut Kemenag RI? Muhammdiyah.or.Id.
Ngulya, K., & Sukardi. (2024). Analisis Pembelajaran Toleransi dalam Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum Merdeka Kelas II Sekolah Dasar (Analysis of Tolerance Learning in the Indonesian Textbook of the Independent Curriculum for Grade II Elementary School). Primary: Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Kependidikan Dasar, 16(1), 63–78.
Rasyid, M. M. (2025). Indonesia’s terrorist networks are adapting, not disappearing. https://eastasiaforum.org/2025/04/18/indonesias-terrorist-networks-are-adapting-not-disappearing/
Rohayani, I., Gazali, H., & Setiawan, D. A. (2023). Pendidikan Pancasila untuk SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas XII. Pusat Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Siregar, M. (2019). Kritik terhadap Teori Dekonstruksi Derrida. Journal of Urban Sociology, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v2i1.611
Sopian, T., Irwansyah, I., Mario, M., & Arisnawati, A. (2021). Terrorism Habitus Reproduction in Indonesia (Study of Pierre Bordieu’s Thought in Potraying Terror Behavior in Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v10i2.4978
Widyawati, D. (2025). ISU-ISU SEJARAH KONTROVERSI DALAM BUKU TEKS PELAJARAN IPS SMA [Universitas PGRI Palembang]. http://eprints.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/2527/
Yasi, S. M. W., Warto, W., & Sunardi, S. (2018). Tolerance Representation in the Historical Textbooks. IJMMU: International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(6). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i6.939
Yuliana, A. P., Chairiyah, Nadziroh, & Pratomo, W. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DALAM MENUMBUHKAN SIKAP TOLERANSI DI KELAS IV SISWA SDN KEPUTRAN 1 YOGYKARTA. Jurnal PEKAN, 9(1), 77–87.




