EVALUASI PROGRAM AL-MIFTAH LIL ULUM DI PPTQ AL-MANNAN TULUNGAGUNG: PENDEKATAN MODEL CIPP (CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, PRODUCT)

Penulis

  • Adhiswar Azizi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Ishthifaul Ashfia Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Diponegoro Tulungagung
  • Ni'matul Ula Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Ayu Anis Eliyana Azis Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Ahmad Yanto Ferdiansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35897/studipesantren.v6i2.2697

Kata Kunci:

Evaluation, CIPP Model, Al-Miftah lil Ulum, Pesantren

Abstrak

This study aims to evaluate the Al-Miftah lil Ulum program at PPTQ Al-Mannan Tulungagung using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. The Al-Miftah lil Ulum method, developed by Pondok Pesantren Sidogiri, has been widely adopted by various Islamic educational institutions as an innovative approach to learning classical Islamic texts (kitab kuning). A qualitative approach with a single case study design was employed in this research. Data were collected through participatory observation over three meetings, semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected informants consisting of the pesantren leader, program coordinator, teachers, students, and administrators, as well as documentation studies of archives and activity photographs. The Miles and Huberman interactive model was used for data analysis, encompassing data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that from the context aspect, this program is highly suitable for the needs of beginner students who mostly have not yet learned nahwu (Arabic grammar). From the input aspect, the program has certified teachers and complete teaching materials, though still constrained by limited learning facilities. From the process aspect, learning proceeds according to the six-stage standard procedure, albeit sometimes hindered by teachers' busy schedules. From the product aspect, the program achieved a 100% pass rate in the first volume with an average score of 82. This study concludes that the Al-Miftah lil Ulum program is effective for beginner students, while recommending improvements in infrastructure and scheduling. The CIPP model is suggested for adoption by other pesantren in evaluating their learning programs.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Al-Mahmudy, R. (2018). Efektivitas metode Al-Miftah lilʻulum dalam meningkatkan kualitas membaca kitab kuning pada santri madrasah diniah. Piwulang, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32478/piwulang.v2i1.300

Anam, S. (2021). Pembelajaran kitab akhlak lil banin dalam menanamkan akhlak karimah bagi santri di Pondok Pesantren Darul Hikam Joresan Mlarak Ponorogo (Disertasi). IAIN Ponorogo.

Azra, A. (1999). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi menuju milenium baru. Jakarta: Logos.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bruinessen, M. van. (1995). Kitab kuning, pesantren dan tarekat: Tradisi-tradisi Islam di Indonesia. Bandung: Mizan.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124- 130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Darmansyah, D., Azwarman, A., & Erdawati, E. (2017). Menciptakan pembelajaran menyenangkan melalui optimalisasi jeda strategis dengan karikatur humor dalam belajar matematika. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 21(2), 39-67. ISSN: 1411- 2744. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jtp

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227- 268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dhofier, Z. (1982). Tradisi pesantren: Studi tentang pandangan hidup kyai. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). London: Pearson.

Djamarah, S. B. (2013). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio- educational model. New York: Peter Lang.

Hidayat, T. (2017). Pengantar ilmu nahwu. Bandung: Pustaka Al-Hidayah.

Huda, I. M., Muchlish, M., & Ahmadi, M. P. I. (2020). Konfigurasi kāna wa akhawātuhā pada kitab arbaīn nawawiyah dalam konteks pembelajaran bahasa Arab. AL- AF'IDAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Pengajarannya, 4(1), 88-102. ISSN: 2580-3484, 2655-3325. https://ejournal.iaimbima.ac.id/index.php/afidah

Humayro Toha, & Wargadinata, W. (2023). Efektivitas metode Al Miftah lil Ulum dalam memahami ilmu nahwu pada santri Madrasah Tsanawiyah Mambaus Sholihin. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 1-17. ISSN: 2087-7064, 2549- 7146. http://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jpi

Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.

Larasati, E. P. (2024). Efektivitas buku Al-Miftah Lil 'Ulum dalam pembelajaran nahwu di Pondok Pesantren Mahasiswa Al-Fattah Kartasura. ATHLA: Journal of Arabic Teaching, Linguistic and Literature, 5(1), 49-62. ISSN: 2774-6461, 2774- 6488. https://ejournal.uinsaid.ac.id/index.php/athla

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Lubis, F. (2016). Efektifitas pembelajaran ditinjau dari pelaksanaan supervisi. Ta'dib, 19(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v19i1.446

Madjid, N. (1997). Bilik-bilik pesantren: Sebuah potret perjalanan. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Ma'rifah, S., Sunok, A., & Fuadiy, M. R. (2024). Challenges and solutions in the implementation of the contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model in Islamic religious education at MTs Al-Anwar and SMP Al-Jihad. Jurnal Ilmiah, 5(2). ISSN: 2338-9400 (print), 2808-2621. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jkc

Mastuhu. (1994). Dinamika sistem pendidikan pesantren. Jakarta: INIS.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Muzaky, C. M., & Ishari, N. (2020). Implementasi metode Al-Miftah lil Ulum dalam pembelajaran kitab kuning di Pondok Pesantren Sidogiri Pasuruan. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 22- 36. https://doi.org/10.36835/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.607

Nurcholish, A. (2018). Problematika pembelajaran nahwu di pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 145-160. ISSN: 2355-4339 (print), 2460-8149. https://jurnal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jpi

Restu, M., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Implementasi metode Al Miftah lil Ulum dalam membaca kitab Fathul Qorib bagi pemula di Pondok Pesantren Sidogiri Salafi Kabupaten Pasuruan. Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Keislaman, 9(3), 263-272. ISSN: 1979-2050 (print), 2685-4155. https://ejournal.iai- tribakti.ac.id/index.php/intelektual

Rokhimah, A. A. (2025). Implementasi metode Al Miftah Lil Ulum pada pembelajaran nahwu di Lembaga Kursus Bahasa Arab Irsyada (Skripsi). UIN Saizu Purwokerto.

Rozi, F., & Zubaidi, A. (2019). Efektivitas penerapan metode Al-Miftah li al-Ulum dalam belajar membaca buku klasik di PP. Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo. Murôbbî: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 157- 174. https://doi.org/10.52431/murobbi.v3i2.201

Sari, N. K. (2018). Analisis metode Al-Miftah lil Ulum sebagai mediator metode membaca kitab klasik di Pondok Pesantren Terpadu Al-Yasini. Semnasbama, 2.

Siswati, V., Fauzi, A., Mustafidah, H. I., & Suharto, Y. (2022). The strategy of Islamic religious teachers in learning to read the students' book with the Al-Miftah lil Ulum Sidogiri method. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 1342- 1353. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i3.2538

Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. Dalam T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31-62). Dordrecht: Springer.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York: Guilford Publications.

Suryadin, Sari, & Nurfitriani. (2020). Evaluasi program model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product): Antara teori dan praktiknya. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Suseno, S. R. (2025). Desain media pembelajaran dalam pendidikan. Jurnal Media Pembelajaran, 10(2), 562-577. ISSN: 2089-4341, 2655-9633. https://jurnal.uia.ac.id/index.php/akademika

Suyedi, S. S., & Idrus, Y. (2019). Hambatan-hambatan belajar yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah dasar desain. Gorga: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 8(1), 120-128. ISSN: 2301- 594. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/gorga

Syamsuddin, A. (2015). Ilmu nahwu untuk pemula. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia.

Wahid, A. (2001). Menggerakkan tradisi: Esai-esai pesantren. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Ya'qub, E. (1993). Panduan praktis belajar nahwu. Bandung: Diponegoro.

Zainuddin, F., & Che Hat, N. (2025). Qur'anic insights on educational evaluation: A semantic study. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 11(1), 49-62. ISSN: 2460-2280, 2549-9017. https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/langkawi

Zuhairini, dkk. (2008). Sejarah pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-07-22

Cara Mengutip

Adhiswar Azizi, Ishthifaul Ashfia, Ni'matul Ula, Ayu Anis Eliyana Azis, & Ahmad Yanto Ferdiansyah. (2026). EVALUASI PROGRAM AL-MIFTAH LIL ULUM DI PPTQ AL-MANNAN TULUNGAGUNG: PENDEKATAN MODEL CIPP (CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, PRODUCT). Jurnal Studi Pesantren, 6(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.35897/studipesantren.v6i2.2697