KAJIAN LIVING LAW TERHADAP MAHAR BHOKA DALAM PERNIKAHAN BEDA STRATA SOSIAL SUKU BUTON
Prespektif Hukum Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.1968Keywords:
Living Law, Mahar Bhoka, Pernikahan Beda Strata Sosial, Suku Buton, 'Urf as a Living LawAbstract
This study examines the tradition of determining the bhoka dowry in inter-social strata marriages within the Buton Tribe in Baubau City. In Buton’s customary law, society is divided into three social classes: Kaomu (nobility), Walaka (middle class), and Papara (commoners), each with different dowry values regulated by the Sultanate. Traditionally, marriages between Kaomu women and Papara men are prohibited and subject to customary fines. Using a descriptive qualitative method with an Islamic legal sociology approach—applying the theories of Living Law, Symbolic Interactionism, and ‘Urf—this research involved interviews with traditional, religious, and community leaders, as well as inter-class married couples, through snowball sampling, alongside observation and documentation. The findings reveal three main stages in determining the dowry: lukuti, pesoloi, and losa, which include a lineage tracing process (tiliki) by a spokesperson (tolowea) to decide dowry amounts and customary sanctions for inter-class unions. Community leaders’ perspectives on inter-social marriages are divided, though most view the traditional prohibitions as no longer relevant amid modern social dynamics. Furthermore, the dowry custom in inter-social marriages still functions as a living law within the Buton community, as it meets the core principles of the Living Law theory.
Downloads
References
Amir Syarifuddin. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Zikarul Hakim, 2004.
Amrullah Hayatudin. Ushul Fiqh: Jalan Tengah Memahami Hukum Islam. Cet. I. Jakarta: Amzah, 2019.
Anisa Fitri Wibowo, Azriel Viero Sadam, Muhammad Ramadavin. “Implikasi Pasal Living Law Dalam Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Terbaru Terhadap Kehidupan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Selisik Vol. 9, no. No. 1 (2023): 120–27.
Christinawati, Ayu Denis. “Living Law Dalam KUHP Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Adat Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Penegakan Hukum.” Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 3, no. No. 1 (2024): 84–94.
Darmawati. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2019.
David Nelken. “‘Eugen Ehrlich, Living Law, and Plural Legalities.’” Theoretical Inquiries in Law Vol. 9, no. No. 2 (2008): 446.
Firdaus. Al-Qawaid Al-Fiqhiyyah: Membahasa Kaidah-Kaidah Pokok Dan Populer Fiqh. Cet. I. Sumatera Barat: Imam Bonjol Press, 2015.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahnya. Karanganyar: Salman, 2017.
Lis Anjelina. “Mahar Perkawinan Adat Suku Buton Perspektif Teori Hudud Muhammad Shahrur (Studi Kasus Di Desa Bahari, Kecamatan Sampolawa, Kabupaten Buton Selatan.” SAKINA: Journal Of Family Studies 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–12.
Marzellina Hadiyanti dan Sugiyanto. “Relevansi Living Law Theorie Dalam RUU Masyarakat Adat Pada Sistem Negara Hukum Prismatik.” Jurnal Progressive Law and Society Vol. 1, no. No. 1 (2023): 42–53.
Nasrun Haoren. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1997.
Nawawi. Ushul Fiqh: Sejarah, Teori Lughawy, Dan Teori Maqashidy. Cet. I. Batu: Literasi Nusantara, 2020.
Rusdaya Basri. Fiqh Munakahat: 4 Mazhab Dan Kebijakan Pemerintah. Parepare: CV. Kaaffah Learning Center, 2019.
Syamsiah Nur, dkk. Fikih Munakahat: Hukum Perkawinan Dalam Islam. Tasikmalaya: CV Hasna Pustaka, 2022.
Zuchri Abdussamad. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Cet. I. Makassar: CV Syakir Media Press, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rismayani, Muhammad Andi Akmal, St. Halimang, , Musafir Pabbabari, Irwanti Said

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






